Author: Daria Bloodworth

Given Time, There is No Problem That is Insurmountable

Posted on by Daria Bloodworth

One of the things I love about companies like Automattic1 are statements like the Automattic Creed. And one of the things in their creed is the statement that “given time, there is no problem that’s insurmountable”. I genuinely like this idea. As someone who fought IRCC for years and eventually won permanent resident status, I believe that given enough time (and your mental health2), there truly is no problem that is insurmountable.

More details from Automattic

And of course, Automattic themselves had more to say on that line.

The key here is “given time.” Much of the work that we do is hard. It’s easier to put everyone in the same database. It’s easier to put everyone on the same domain, and you look much better on comScore rather than being dark matter. Open source eventually dominates every market it enters, but sometimes “eventually” can take a while. For online publishing and content management systems, WordPress helped it happen quickly.3 “Linux on the desktop”4 is perpetually a few years away.

We have to be comfortable swimming upstream, with most of the world considering us wrong for long periods of time. This is uncomfortable. Sometimes it means we’ll be ostracized. More often people, “Silicon Valley,” or the market will consider us parochial, unambitious, or just plain stupid. They’ll be right unless our success proves differently.

But, as someone who has been trying to lose weight and finish transition in the last twenty years, I know that some problems require more time to solve. In fact, getting permanent resident status has actually considerably advanced the goal of finishing transition. After all, I do live in the Territory with the best gender affirming care coverage in Canada.

Further, I think losing weight is the wrong metric, especially given that burning fat is much harder to guarantee by your own actions. All the dieting and exercising in the world can’t solve for a shitty metabolism. But, one thing I can do is focus on building muscle instead. Building muscle is easier. All I need is protein in + work to build muscle. Also, the number on the scale means fuck all to me. I just want to look good naked.

On swimming upstream

But yes, swimming upstream is not the most popular idea. Hell, my swimming upstream attracted the ire and abuse of my soon-to-be-ex-husband. And no, I’m not just talking about him scoffing at the idea of developing passive income given the insecurity with traditional employment. I’m also talking about how he would chew me out for not being able to find a job in Alberta, something I’ve always had trouble with. A job search that was fruitless for over a year only ended because I expanded my job search to the Yukon after learning about their gender affirming care coverage. But this would have been mitigated had I resisted my husband’s bad advice.

You see, my husband had a lot of limiting beliefs. Probably still does but I don’t talk to him anymore, so I couldn’t get a pulse on that. This caused him to start some projects with immense passion but then let them fall by the wayside. An example of this is his blog about Alberta politics, Bertatics. I encouraged him and for a couple of months, he sounded like he was fired up. But when it came to actually doing the work? He couldn’t deliver. He only made one post back at the beginning of 2024.

… In fact, writing this now, it reminds me of why it is so critical that I should finish editing Project Ouzel so I can start working on other projects without neglecting the ones closest to fruition. Because while the author’s path is a harder, longer path to profitability, I feel like it is more sustainable in the long term than traditional employment could ever be. But what do I know? I just have 22 years of experience on the matter. I’ve had some years where I made six figures as a web developer and was getting interviews with Mozilla and Automattic, others where I was on social assistance.

Sometimes, experience says swimming upstream is the only thing that makes sense.

  1. Automattic is the company that created WordPress.com, the SaaS version of WordPress, along with a bunch of other assorted tools. [↩]
  2. Yeah, I wound up unknowingly sacrificing my mental health to obtain permanent resident status. Coercive control is a bitch. [↩]
  3. Hell yeah, I was there for this, back in the olden days when “installing a WordPress plugin” meant copying PHP code from random sites on the Internet and pasting it somewhere in your code. It’s amazing that more WordPress sites didn’t get bricked back then. [↩]
  4. I think the Linux on the desktop is getting a lot of support from the actions of both the Trump Administration and Microsoft/Apple. There are some people for whom the death of Rosetta 2 will not be a deal breaker. Just like there are some people for whom the death of 32-bit support in Mac OS X was not a deal breaker. Or the death of PowerPC support was not a deal breaker. Not to mention the fact that Windows 11 is simply a hot mess and Microsoft broke a lot of trust with users. [↩]

Having to Admit Why I Missed the Exercise Classes

Posted on by Daria Bloodworth

So, this evening, I’m going to start attending the exercise classes run by the Yukon Bariatric Program again. But, there’s the little matter of why I stopped attending in the first place. I don’t have to explain myself in front of the class, though, because I’d already told the nurse who co-runs it with the physical trainer. That’s when I admitted the why, and it was my Murderbot moment. I had to admit that the reason I stopped attending the exercise classes was because I wanted to watch the episodes of Silo season 3 as they came out.

It is a premium quality show, after all.

But, since season 3 of Silo is over and season four isn’t coming out until next July, I have no excuse not to attend the exercise classes. Though, I am going to have to delay my participation for a couple of minutes. After all, the classes start at 6pm and that is a rather inconvenient conflict with Liber Resh. Though, I could make the exercise that would immediately follow part of the post-Resh meditation.

I miss the pool.

Talking exercise and meditation always takes me back to the pool at the Canada Games Centre. The City closed it for annual maintenance a few months back, and since I left Arctic Star, money’s been tight, so swimming fell by the wayside.

But swimming laps for thirty minutes to an hour could be a pretty meditative practice to chase Resh with. It’s definitely an idea I’m looking to research and write about over on my author blog.

I’m Writing a Horrible Five Part Series of Posts, Let’s Talk About a Horse!

Posted on by Daria Bloodworth
The sign printed and taped to the side of the coin box, which reads as such: The Age Limit is 12 and the weight limit is 100 lbs, please respect these restrictions so Champion can continue being enjoyed by future generations. SHE IS 70 YEARS OLD! The first sentence is highlighted in yellow.

So, something terrible happened yesterday morning. I got an e-mail from IRCC. Like most communication I get from IRCC, it is a harbinger of tiring bullshit to come. Originally, it was supposed to be one post. However, after exploring the legal strategy and the religious reasons why I’m against pretending to be male, one post turned into five. So far, the series is 5,000 words and growing.

So tonight, with ninety minutes before bed, I’m choosing to think about the most pressing civic issue in Whitehorse: a horse I am contractually forbidden from riding. From the post header image above, we are at the Hougen Centre on Main Street. Well, okay, “contractually” is doing some heavy lifting there. I’m just an adult who can read. As someone who is trying to be an author, it’s going to be hard to argue that I didn’t see the three separate notices around the horse. I’d like to ride that horse, however, there’s just one problem.

You see, Champion is an old mechanical horse from the 1950s. As a result, there is an age limit of 12 and a weight limit of 45kg. Fascists.

But, you see, I’m the kind of person who sees this not as a hard boundary. Rather, it’s a mechanical problem. A physics problem, truly. How can I ride this horse without damaging it? Further, how can I present this case to the management of the Hougen Centre so they’ll let me ride the horse? Because I can’t accept that the hard limit is 45kg and if someone who is 45.1kg gets on, they break the damn horse.

The current fly in the ointment: I’m nowhere near the weight limit right now

I’m not stupid. I know full well that being three times the weight limit, I’d break Champion. No cap. However, as someone who knows how to use a TDEE calculator, I know that a healthy weight for a woman of my age and height is 62-64kg. This is a much easier ask than being roughly 140kg wanting to ride the horse. Still outside the posted weight limit, but much closer than I am right now. Thankfully, I’m participating in the Yukon Bariatric Program. I’m hoping in 2-3 years’ time, I’ll be much closer to my goal weight. By then, I’m aiming to be a published author. Maybe, just maybe, people will be reading this blog other than a few developers who get lured here with the promise of WordPress plugins and PHP libraries.

… If that’s the case, could we figure out a way for me to ride Champion? At least by then, I’ll have moved from catastrophically ineligible to just regular ineligible. And hey, it never hurts to ask. After all, I’m planning on fighting a legal battle with less favourable odds. I’ve already beat the odds expected of me by one particular Service Alberta employee. She thought CBSA would have deported me by now.

Safe Here, But Unable to Travel Anywhere

Posted on by Daria Bloodworth

Ever since 2019, Canada’s been my home and I’ve also been effectively unable to leave Canada. At first, this was because I was actively litigating a refugee claim but after Trump regained the Presidency in 2024, one of his first acts was to deny transgender people many of the rights of citizenship. One of these rights is the ability to access accurate passports. I applied for a certificate of identity in mid-July because, unfortunately, I am unable to obtain a legally usable, accurate passport from the US. Legally unusable pursuant to Canadian and American law.

While the harm was ordered by the Trump administration, the fact of the matter is that without a valid travel document, I am effectively unable to travel to my country of nationality. The Canadian courts have, to varying extents, recognized a denial of a national passport as a form of functional statelessness. In my previous post, I discuss the legal precedent of Canada v. Ward, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 689, where the Supreme Court of Canada affirms this logic.

The Cage

In a report on ghost immigrants and Sunny Wang’s Newcan immigration consultancy fraud, CBC’s The Fifth Estate touched on a fairly unique concept. Ian Young from the South China Morning Post referred to it as “Yiminjian” or “immigration jail”. This concept interprets the residency requirement as a form of “jail”. For me, I can see the applicability of this concept as the border has become not just much harder for me to cross but to the point of virtually impossible and legally perilous.

The concept is also echoed in interviews with stateless person Mike Gogulski. Unlike Gogulski, I’m in a much more precarious position as I do not have a legally usable travel document. He, on the other hand, has been issued a stateless person’s travel document by the Slovakian government. And even he characterizes his position as being “in a cage” due to his severely restricted ability to travel.

IRCC’s complicity

I have been actively reaching out to the powers that be to try to resolve this issue. And their initial correspondence once they received my application is not promising. Here is the bit of the letter they sent me that makes me think that IRCC is unlikely to grant me a Certificate of Identity.

Certificates of Identity are issued to permanent residents of Canada who are not yet Canadian citizens, and who, although not considered to have refugee status in Canada, are otherwise stateless or unable, for a valid reason, to obtain a national passport or travel document from any source. These documents are not issued simply to facilitate travel or the attainment of visas.

Since you are a citizen of the United States of America you would not, under normal circumstances, qualify for a Certificate of Identity unless a request for passport facilities was refused by the authorities of the United States of America and you could provide this office with the letter of refusal.

The information contained in your application does not provide us with sufficient grounds to warrant the issuance of a Certificate of Identity. It is, therefore, suggested that you communicate in writing with the embassy to determine your eligibility to obtain passport facilities, retaining copies of your letters as well as the registration receipt from the postal authorities. If your request is refused, forward the letter of refusal to this office. If the letter is not written in French or English it will be necessary for you to provide a certified translation.

I want to share what I sent them. This included the application with a 16-page letter that outlined why I can’t obtain a legally usable, accurate US passport, the risk of travelling under a false passport under US and Canadian law. I also included the following:

Corresponding with the Powers that Be

When IRCC determined, for reasons unstated, that the documentation I provided “does not provide us sufficient grounds to warrant the issuance of a Certificate of Identity”, I started reaching out. This determination was made in spite of the fact that there’s a clear causal chain between the Executive Order that directed the denial, the impact of the denial resulting in initial granting of injunctive relief, and the reversal of said relief by SCOTUS. I reached out to my US Congressman and Senators. These are Congressman Joe Neguse, Senator Michael Bennet, and Senator John Hickenlooper. Congressman Neguse’s office took point on this inquiry. Eventually, I received forwarded correspondence from the American Citizen Services chief of the Vancouver Consulate. While it didn’t deny me a passport specifically by name, it did reinforce my thesis.

Current US passport makes it extremely unlikely that a transgender person would be able to successfully apply for and receive an accurate, legally usable passport.

I forwarded this fact to IRCC early last month. The last correspondence I received from IRCC is from the Minister’s office. Strap in people, this gets ridiculous.

The correspondence from the Ministerial Enquiries Division

This is the e-mail I received from the Ministerial Enquiries Division, which is apparently who responds when you e-mail [email protected].

Dear Daria Bloodworth:

Thank you for your correspondence dated August 17, 2026, addressed to the Honourable Lena Metlege Diab, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship, regarding your immigration situation. I have been asked to respond to you.

I appreciate you sharing the circumstances that prompted you to write, and I understand that you are going through a difficult time. Canada has a proud history of providing protection to the world’s most vulnerable groups, including persons in the LGBTQ2 community. Canada relies primarily on the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to identify individuals for resettlement to Canada who are the most vulnerable and at risk. These individuals include persons persecuted on the basis of their sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. Private sponsorship groups in Canada can also identify refugees who need to be resettled, including individuals from the LGBTQ2 community.

I note that you have contacted to the Case Processing Centre in Sydney, which is the appropriate office to respond to your request.

Although I understand that this may not be the response you had anticipated, I hope that you will find this information to be helpful.

Sincerely,

Ministerial Enquiries Division

I’m honestly not sure what any of this has to do with my Certificate of Identity application. In fact, it reads more like meritless back patting. They can claim that “Canada has a proud history of providing protection to the world’s most vulnerable groups” but I know better. I have first hand experience of how hard IRCC fights against transgender people who win a refugee claim. As of this date, the Case Processing Centre in Sydney has not responded to my request for a Certificate of Identity and we are well past double the service standard set by IRCC. The first, last, and only time I heard from the Case Processing Centre in Sydney was back in early August. This was almost two months ago.

Echoes from the past

There is a woman who was in a similar situation to my own. Guldana Salimjan only got her Certificate of Identity expedited after CBC reported on her story. She made more than twenty inquiries to IRCC and waited nearly six months before the media paid attention and got IRCC to act. Six months past mid-July, my US passport will already be expired.

In fact, the CBC article contains one line that sends chills down my spine and raises another very important question. And I’ll quote that line now:

According to the IRCC letter, Chinese citizens wouldn’t normally qualify for a Canadian certificate of identity, unless accompanied by paperwork from Chinese authorities proving their ineligibility for a Chinese passport.

Call me crazy, but that has a lot of parallels to the letter I received from IRCC in early August. Makes me wonder if this is a form letter that IRCC likes to send out when people apply for a Certificate of Identity. That suspicion is only strengthened by the volume of supporting evidence I submitted to IRCC when I applied for my Certificate of Identity. So, the case of Guldana Salimjan raises four very important questions.

Why do we need a journalist to get IRCC to act?

Why can’t the process just work?

What are my options if I can’t get a journalist to care about my application?

Is IRCC sending form letters with canned responses to applicants for Certificates of Identity in lieu of actually evaluating the applications on the merits?

So, what next?

As I said in my previous post on this topic, there is a clock ticking on this problem. January 10th, 2027 is the expiry date on both my US passport book and card. This means on January 11th, 2027, I will be without a valid travel document. And they are in the custody of IRCC, awaiting a decision on my Certificate of Identity. The question is no longer whether this policy denies me a passport, it’s whether anyone notices before the last accurate one I own expires.

The Real World Impact of Being Denied an Accurate, Legally Usable Passport

Posted on by Daria Bloodworth

I want to clarify one thing specifically. I don’t have a denial letter for myself, specifically. As of this date, I have not made an application for a US passport since receiving my last US passport book and card on January 11th, 2017. However, I know full well that the policy of the United States government, along with the results of similarly situated persons, demonstrates that the United States government will either issue me a false passport inconsistent with my actual sex or deny me a passport at all. This is due to Trump’s own personal “gender ideology” that trans women are somehow “male”. This is the problem with electing a man who constantly needs cognitive tests to the highest office in the land.

So, why haven’t I applied?

The answer is quite simple and is threefold. Though, I do need to explain a bit more about each time period.

When the Canada Border Services Agency had my passport

Before Trump took office and signed the executive order that directed the State Department to start issuing false passports to trans people, my US passport was not in my possession. I was actively litigating a refugee claim requesting Canada’s protection. As a part of the process, I had to surrender any and all American identification I had. This included my Colorado ID card, my Global Entry card, and my US Passport book and card.

I would have tried to renew it before Trump actually took office if I had access to my US passports. I say this with certainty because I did this before Trump’s first term started. When I renewed my US passport in 2016, I received my US passport just days before the first Trump administration took power. From November 2019 to the day I complied with my departure order in May 2025, my US passport was not in my possession.

After CBSA returned my passport to me and injunctive relief was granted

In late April, the Federal Court informed me that my Application for Leave and for Judicial Review was denied. This was the effective end of my refugee claim. I exhausted the last of my appeals and had to leave Canada. I immediately started reaching out to CBSA to arrange for my departure from Canada. Eventually, after obtaining contradictory answers, I was able to reach out with a local contact with IRCC here in Whitehorse. He connected me with CBSA in Edmonton and we coordinated my voluntary departure from Canada. Well, as “voluntary” as it can be when you’ve spent the majority of the previous decade fighting to remain in Canada.

However, on May 23rd, 2025, I received my Confirmation of Departure from Canada as I boarded my one-way flight to Denver. On May 27th, 2025, I immediately applied for Permanent Resident status. On June 21st, 2025, I returned to Canada on a one way flight back to Edmonton on a visitor visa. No injunctive relief was available in the four days between my return to the United States and my application for a permanent resident visa.

When the Court ordered injunctive relief

When injunctive relief was possible, I was not able to avail myself of that relief for two reasons. The first is that I was not yet a part of the defined class. My passport had more than a year of validity from the date the District Court granted relief until that relief was overturned by SCOTUS. I was never included in the Orr class while the relief was available. The second reason was, even if I wanted to attempt while the injunction was in force, I needed a passport. I was in the process of applying for permanent resident status. From May 27th to December 16th, 2025, I could not part with my passport. Not until I received my Electronic Confirmation of Permanent Resident status.

Why can’t I apply now?

And now? Now, I have no injunctive relief to rely on. I am watching the Orr case move its way through the American court system. I am watching the State Department argue in open court that it should have the right to issue false passports to transgender people. Passports that are effectively useless, given how negatively immigration officials around the world view the usage of false passports. The latest Order from the District of Massachusetts is an order for discovery from the Orr plaintiffs. So, needless to say, this case is likely to drag on long past the day I finally become eligible to apply for Canadian citizenship.

Why can’t I use an inaccurate passport?

Because I know that immigration officials take a fairly dim view of people who present false documents to them. I freely admit that the legality of false passports actually issued by the national authority is untested. However, the chain of facts remain the same. I know full well I’m not male. I don’t believe that every employee of the State Department is unwell enough to believe any woman, whether trans or cis, is “male”. Therefore, there is at least one, if not more, point of intentional falsification of a US passport.

So, even having it is a crime under 18 USC § 1543. But using it is a separate crime. And even though I’d likely be acquitted due to the fact that my receipt and usage of it is wholly due to State action, this only resolves the liability under 18 USC § 1543. Entrapment by the US government is not a defence to criminal inadmissibility to Canada under s. 36 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Conviction is not a requirement for me to be found inadmissible under s. 36 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. The act is enough to destroy the life I’ve built for myself in Canada.

I also tend to believe that when it comes to lying to the government, the dildo of consequences rarely arrives lubed.

So, what’s next?

The clock continues to tick down. Barring a miracle out of the District of Massachusetts, January 10th, 2027 is the last day that I have access to a legally usable, accurate US passport. Well, in theory. After all, IRCC has actual custody of my US passport while they’re processing my Certificate of Identity application. But after January 10th, 2027, I will, for all intents and purposes, be “effectively stateless” due to the hardships placed upon me by the US government. This is not just my opinion but the opinion of the UNHCR and the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada v. Ward. To quote the Court:

The inquiry as to whether a claimant meets the “Convention refugee” definition must focus on whether there is a “well‑founded fear”, which the claimant must first establish, and all that follows must be “by reason of” that fear. Two categories, both requiring the claimant to be outside his or her state of nationality by reason of that fear, exist. The first requires that the claimant be unable to avail him‑ or herself of that state’s protection. It originally related only to stateless persons, but can now include those refused passports or other protections by their state of nationality.

While I accept that this doesn’t cite either the Royal Prerogative or the Citizenship Act, it doesn’t need to. The fact that they recognize that the denial of a passport by a person’s state as a hardship is enough. If the Canadian government has chosen to mitigate those hardships by granting me a Certificate of Identity, I’ll consider this resolved. However, if they choose either to deny the Certificate of Identity application or fail to render a decision by that date, that’s a different story. I’ll look at other legal remedies available to me.

Finally Getting Around to Taking the iPhone Photography Course I Signed Up (and Paid) For

Posted on by Daria Bloodworth
This entry is part 1 of 1 in the series Learning to Take Photos For My Blog(s)

So, most of the cover photos for the two blogs I’m currently running (this one and dariabloodworth.ca) are from Pexels. It’s a good option, it’s not AI slop, and it’s fair use. But here’s the thing, I read a lot of posts from pro-AI people talking about willfully violating the rules of platforms that are against AI slop being submitted to their platforms. Also, there is something beautiful about taking my own photos for my own blog. And I have been interested in photography for a while. It’s one of those art forms that I can do in spite of having the shittiest motor skills imaginable.

Welcome back to iPhone Photography School, here’s an ad!

Knowing what I needed to work on, I logged into iPhone Photography School. After all, I paid for the course content, I might as well take advantage of it. And, immediately upon logging in, I got a pop-up modal ad for some shit they’re pushing called “AI Lab”. And when I exited it, I got a hero ad for… AI Lab. I get the distinct sense that they’re interested in pushing AI crap on me.

The modal ad for their AI slop service, with a countdown!
A hero ad for their AI slop service, with the requisite countdown!

And when I got past the big AI slop advert, I saw that I didn’t get too far into the course material. Which is pretty… typical for me in recent years. And I’m honestly not happy about that fact, but I’m going through some pretty decently sized life changes and I’m back in the Yukon for a reason.

Several, in fact.

But, while I’m here, I am engaging with the Yukon’s bariatric program… not because I need bariatric surgery. In fact, I’ve already had bariatric surgery. But after having had bariatric surgery in Fort Collins, I didn’t get any post-op support after I plateaued. This clinic seems different. They put me on Vyvanse, which I actually was on back in Longmont but I was using it for treating the ADHD part of my AuDHD. But, this time, it’s to try to accelerate my metabolism to get me out of the rut that is keeping me from losing weight. But, now that I’m on Vyvanse again, maybe I should try to enrich myself. It’s time to learn a skill.

Back in the Course

It’s time to actually complete the iPhone Photography School course I paid for. And if that pink bit in the Module 1 part in the sidebar is any indication, I didn’t get too far in the course. This both makes me feel bad that I didn’t take this course that I paid for… but also good in the sense that I didn’t forget things that I had actually learned.

The content of my iPhone Photography School iPhone Photography course.

I also want to add, they have a crapton of courses… and I actually paid for two of them. The iPhone photography course and a separate iPhone video course. I might blog about taking that one later. But this post is about getting back into this photography course. And I’m going to try to complete Modules 1 & 2 this week. So, yes, I used another cover photo from Pexels for this post. But I’m hoping that I’ll be able to change the ratio to be mostly my own photos.

P.S. I noticed the advert in the footer

Also, yes, I have noticed that there’s an advert to upsell me lifetime updates for this course for iOS 26. This site seems to love upselling their other courses and I’m not going to lie, some of them look very interesting and I might sign up for those too. We’ll see how this one goes first. But as for purchasing lifetime updates for my course, I’m not going to be taking advantage of that. Mostly because I do intend to leave the Apple ecosystem fully at some point. And unless the Fairphone comes to Canada, I’m going to have to wait until I can travel internationally again. That is not going to happen until I either get a Certificate of Identity or become a Canadian citizen. And yes, I have applied for the former. IRCC appears to be taking their time on issuing me a Certificate of Identity.

So, what the hell is this?

Posted on by Daria Bloodworth

Hi there! You’re here a bit earlier than I intended. So, this is yay.ee. It’s a website different from dariabloodworth.ca, mostly because I was tempted to blog about gardening and tech and other things outside of writing. But, if you’re here when this post is live and the site is currently in progress, you might have some questions… like why? How?

Inspiration

Bryan Veloso‘s the one that got me on this. I was there when he was redesigning Avalonstar after the Aries Project. Here’s the way he described what he was up to and here’s how it came along to a fully designed site in roughly a month.

The evolution of the design of Avalonstar

Why?

Well, first, having a domain as short as yay.ee creates a sort of pressure to do something with it apart from receiving e-mail. After all, what else could I do? Put a picture of Fluttershy on here while writing something like “Fluttershy is not a baguette, but she is a cute pony.” I can’t imagine who would do that.

I also have some… problems with my author site that I am currently trying to troubleshoot… and I need a site that is being live designed to test out some theories. Also, I’m actively switching to Linux and I’m kinda cramping my author blog’s style by having my journey to switching to Linux live there.

Also, I fucking hate the site editor function in new WordPress. It offended me so much that, for the first time since it split from b2, I started abandoning WordPress. However, after seeing that I don’t like the other ones (and yes, I’m including ClassicPress in that too), I decided to come back to WordPress.

How?

I’ve downloaded the underscores theme from Automattic. I’m hoping to make… somewhat daily updates to the theme. Keep in mind, I’m actively working on a bunch of novels too. In fact, I’m going to attempt to use the CSSEdit features in Espresso and see if hits the same nostalgia buttons that the old CSSEdit did.